翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Hunter Street (Hamilton, Ontario)
・ Hunter Street (Newcastle)
・ Hunter Street Baptist Church
・ Hunter Street Park
・ Hunter Street, Sydney
・ Hunter Strickland
・ Hunter Synagogue
・ Hunter syndrome
・ Hunter Tootoo
・ Hunter Township
・ Hunter Township, Edgar County, Illinois
・ Hunter Township, Jackson County, Minnesota
・ Hunter TR-12
・ Hunter Tremblay
・ Hunter Tylo
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
・ Hunter v Moss
・ Hunter v Southam Inc
・ Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh
・ Hunter v. Erickson
・ Hunter v. Underwood
・ Hunter Valentine
・ Hunter Valentine EP
・ Hunter Valley (disambiguation)
・ Hunter Valley cannabis infestation
・ Hunter Valley Coal Chain
・ Hunter Valley Grammar School
・ Hunter Valley Important Bird Area
・ Hunter Valley Mining Locomotives
・ Hunter Valley Railway Trust


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd

''Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd'' () (UKHL 14 ) is an English tort law case on the subject of private nuisance. Several hundred claimants alleged that Canary Wharf Ltd, in constructing One Canada Square, had caused nuisance to them by impairing their television signal.〔() AC 655, p. 663〕 The House of Lords held unanimously that such interference could not amount to an actionable nuisance; the nuisance was equivalent to loss of a view, or of a prospect, which had never previously been actionable.
==Facts==
Canary Wharf Ltd undertook to construct a large tower (now known as the One Canada Square), for commercial and residential purposes. The tower was completed in November 1990, reaching 250 metres in height, and 50 metres squared in area.〔() AC 655, p. 662〕 However, the tower, being situated less than 10 kilometres from the BBC's primary television transmitter, in Crystal Palace, interfered with the reception of several hundred home owners. It was submitted that before the construction of the tower (in the summer of 1989), television reception had been good.〔 The issue was remedied in April 1991, whereby a broadcast relay was installed in Balfron Tower, to transmit television signal into the area affected.〔 Nevertheless, the claimants alleged that the large metallic structure had interrupted their television reception, and claimed private nuisance – for loss of enjoyment – and remuneration for their wasted television license fee, for the time their signal had been impaired.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.